Here are Lauriol & Guilaine’s diagrams of Les Lacs dolmens 1 to 5 (from their ’64/’65 dig) :
The order, somehow not surprisingly, goes : 1,2,3 5,4.
Dolmen No. 4 has eluded me. And there is now a Dolmen 6, thanks to Paul Ambert’s searches in ’74 :
Meanwhile there’s a No. 5 to look for:
That’s Ambert’s No. 5. I call it Number 6, because it is the most southerly of all six dolmens.
NB
As you can see, the situation (despite being 4000 years old) is still very fluid.
